Thursday, August 28, 2008


The $300 billion housing bill signed into law on July 30 by President Bush helps stretched homeowners renegotiate their mortgages and provides tax credits to first-time buyers.

But it also addresses three major criticisms of reverse mortgage loans, which are increasingly popular among homeowners 62 and older who use the money for living expenses, health care, prescription drugs or to pay off an existing mortgage.

With a reverse mortgage, you can tap your home equity without having to make monthly payments. Instead the bank pays you. The loan comes due only when you die, sell or move away permanently. The amount you get depends on the home’s value, location, interest rates and the age of the youngest borrower if there are co-owners.


The new bill raises the amount you can get from the mortgage and lowers the cost of getting it.

Most reverse mortgages today are Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECMs), which are insured by the Federal Housing Administration. Up to now, HECM has capped a home’s appraisal, which affects the loan amount. The loan limit depends on the county where the home is located and ranges from $200,160 to $362,790.

While the new limit has not been finalized, the bill will increase the amount significantly. “The higher limit will give homeowners access to more cash from their home equity,” says Peter H. Bell, President of the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association.

A second criticism has been that the transaction fees for reverse mortgages are too high. An AARP Public Policy Institute study in December 2007 found that high costs were one of the main reasons why eligible homeowners decided against a home mortgage.

The new bill will make HECMs less expensive for many borrowers. Origination fees had been a flat 2 percent of the home’s value, but the new bill reduces that to 2 percent of the first $200,000 of the home’s value, and then 1 percent after that. Also, the fee is capped at $6,000.

And finally, the new bill puts an end to one of the main problems related to reverse mortgages: lenders cross-selling other financial products. The new law forbids requiring the purchase of an annuity, insurance product or investment product as a condition of the loan.

“These prohibitions will protect borrowers from aggressive marketers who try to get them to invest proceeds they receive from their reverse mortgages unwisely,” said David Certner, AARP legislative policy director. “For example, pushy marketing tactics used by some originators encourage borrowers to purchase deferred annuities or long-term care insurance products that are costly and generally not in the borrower’s best interest.”

But despite these changes, says Bell, “the most important safeguards remain talking candidly with your reverse mortgage counselor and dealing only with individuals and companies you know and trust, or have thoroughly checked out.”

AARP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cathie Gandel lives in New York and writes about business and finance

Thursday, August 21, 2008

Medicare

HOW IS MEDICARE FINANCED AND WHAT ARE
MEDICARE’S FUTURE FINANCING CHALLENGES?
Funding for Medicare comes primarily from payroll tax
revenues, general revenues, and premiums paid by
beneficiaries.
Medicare is funded as follows:
􀁹 Part A, the Hospital Insurance (HI) Trust Fund, is financed
largely through a dedicated tax of 2.9 percent of earnings paid
by employers and their employees (1.45 percent each). In
2007, these taxes are estimated to account for 86 percent of the
$216 billion in revenue to the Part A Trust Fund.
􀁹 Part B, the
Supplementary Medical
Insurance (SMI) Trust
Fund, is financed
through a combination
of general revenues
and premiums paid by
beneficiaries.
Premiums are
automatically set to
cover 25 percent of
revenues in the
aggregate. In 2007,
Part B revenue is estimated to be $194 billion.
􀁹 Part C is not separately financed.
􀁹 Part D is financed through general revenues, beneficiary
premiums, and state payments for dual eligibles eligible for drug
coverage under state Medicaid programs prior to 2006. In 2007,
Part D revenue is projected to be $64 billion, 78 percent of
which will be from general revenues.